Facebook has become the latest company that everyone loves to hate, and internal documents stolen by an employee have become an opening to blame the social-media giant for America’s ills. The company has made mistakes, but it’s worth sorting the genuine issues from the opportunism of politicians looking to censor opponents.
Both were on display Tuesday as Frances Haugen, the former employee who leaked the documents, testified on Capitol Hill. One of her legitimate concerns is Facebook’s negative influence on the mental health of teenagers. It’s no surprise to parents that teens are emotionally fragile and especially vulnerable to peer and celebrity influences.
Ms. Haugen’s documents show that Facebook understands its impact on teens but has done little about it. According to its internal research, 82 percent of teens experienced emotional issues in the last month, including poor body image, anxiety and depression. More than half who experience anxiety, family stress and loneliness said they use Instagram to distract from their feelings. One in five U.S. teens said Instagram made them feel worse while 42 percent said it made them feel better.
This is a problem that can’t be solved by government, though some politicians want to try. They’ve proposed eliminating Section 230 liability protection for algorithms or requiring Facebook to submit its algorithms to regulators for review. Just what we need–a Bureau of Algorithms.
A better idea is to give users more control over their news feeds and parents more control over what their kids are exposed to online. Tech companies overall have resisted giving parents more control over what their children see online, and social-media apps are especially unhelpful. Here’s where Congressional pressure could do some good.
Too bad the main concern of many politicians is prodding Facebook to censor “misinformation.” Ms. Haugen seems to agree, and it’s notable that her appearance seems to have been midwifed by Bill Burton, a prominent Democratic communications executive. Facebook is “facing a Big Tobacco moment, a moment of reckoning,” said Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal.
CEO Mark Zuckerberg resisted censorship for some time, but in recent years Facebook has begun to add opinionated “fact-checks” or has censored stories that disagree with progressive orthodoxy on climate, Covid or other issues. Our op-eds have been targeted more than once.
Facebook makes money by targeting ads, so it naturally has an incentive to feed users content that keeps them hooked. But the company has also become a political scapegoat for the deeper-seated cultural problems that its platform can amplify. Congress ought to be examining ways to empower social-media users and parents, rather than bullying Facebook to exercise more control over user speech.
* Guest editorial excerpt by The Wall Street Journal.
Today’s breaking news and more in your inbox
A Extensive Information on Setting Up Parental Controls on Your Units
In present day electronic age, youngsters are exposed to a large array of on the net written content and platforms....
6 Techniques Youngsters Are Obtaining All-around Parental Controls on Apple’s Display screen Time
Apple released Monitor Time as a way for men and women to watch and restrict how a great deal time...
Understanding Parental Controls for Snapchat
While safe for most users, Snapchat can be a cause of worry for parents with teenagers using the platform. These...
US Parental Command Software program Market Sizing Report 2023
Pune, India, Could 09, 2023 (World NEWSWIRE) -- According to Fortune Enterprise Insights, world-wide US parental command computer software market...
TikTok parental controls can assistance protect your boy or girl: how to activate them
TikTok has launched safety capabilities that allow mothers and fathers to manage the written content their kids see on the...
What are parental controls and do they get the job done?
Little ones on PhonesTechnologies has turn into a key component of kids’ increasing working experience. Young children of this period...