Above the years, preserving children’s informational privacy has develop into a controversial situation. From a legal point of view, there are two queries: to what extent does it count upon parental control and consent, and how is this aspect incorporated into the law trying to get to protect children’s informational privacy?

Underneath the Regulation on Kids 2016 (LoC), a little one is described as any individual under the age of 16. Own information and facts, as approved by the Law on Cyberinformation Safety 2015 (LoCS), is any information involved with the identification of a specified man or woman. The LoCS also defines particular info processing as the general performance of a person or far more of the next actions: gathering, enhancing, applying, storing, providing, sharing, or spreading personalized data in cyberspace for commercial uses.

The draft Particular Facts Defense Decree (Draft PDPD), even though employing a comparatively equivalent definition of own info, adopts a far more in depth definition about personalized details processing which is any motion(s) to do with personal knowledge, which include collection, recording, analysis, storage, alteration, disclosure, granting of accessibility to particular information, retrieval, restoration, encryption, decryption, duplicate, transfer, deletion, or destruction of private knowledge or other applicable steps.

As a typical rule, personal info processors shall only obtain one’s own information right after getting the facts subject’s consent regarding the scope and function of the collection and use of these types of details. Some parts of laws, nonetheless, accord consent-dependent security to certain types of data only, these types of as those people on non-public lifetime and/or personalized secrets.

Thanks to actual physical and psychological vulnerabilities, little ones are safeguarded by, in addition to standard protection steps, uniquely tailor-made protection mechanisms. Specifically, the LoC prohibits any functions of announcing or disclosing information about the private daily life or particular techniques of the little one who is 7 a long time aged or older without the need of his or her consent, and the consent of the child’s mother and father or legal guardian. Implementing this principle, Decree No. 56/2017/ND-CP (Decree 56) calls for these kinds of consents to be attained in the case of “uploading the details of the child’s private lifestyle to the internet”.

Nonetheless, supplied that the present and proposed definitions of details processing is broader than the functions now regulated under the LoC and Decree 56, the requirement for consent when the processing of children’s knowledge is performed less than approaches other than asserting or disclosing has nevertheless to be very clear.

While the Draft PDPD delivers for the distinct prerequisite for father or mother or authorized guardian consent for the processing of any personal information of small children, as it has not been handed, the challenge stays unresolved.

Because small children may perhaps be fewer informed of the hazards, consequences, and safeguards anxious and their rights in relation to the processing of particular data, their consents are not legally recognized to have equivalent validity to that of an adult. Hence, the typical rule under the LoCS implementing to all info topics as demonstrated higher than, with out any provisions personalized for young children, need to not be perceived as an exhaustive legal basis for the processing of children’s knowledge.

Provided the troubles, sure prescriptions underneath Vietnam’s Civil Code 2015, which establishes the most normal fundamentals in dealing with all civil issues, would then be the manual. Precisely, in scenarios in which an issue arises beneath the scope of civil legislation that is neither delivered for by legislation nor agreed on by the functions nor controlled by practices, the analogy of legislation shall implement.

Appropriately, civil transactions of any individuals underneath six decades outdated shall be proven and done by their lawful representative and that any folks 6-15 several years outdated shall have the consent of their authorized consultant to build and perform civil transactions, apart from for civil transactions done to satisfy the demands of day by day existence appropriate for the age team. Also, any people 15-18 many years old shall be entitled to enter in and perform civil transactions by on their own, other than for civil transactions relating to actual estate or registration-needed movable qualities and other civil transactions as recommended by law that are issue to the consent of their legal agent.

However, these prescriptions should really be strictly minimal to the processing of children’s data that exclusively relates to the institution and overall performance of civil transactions with minors (individuals beneath 18), as a substitute of currently being generalized as a capture-all basic principle underpinning the strategy of their consent to the processing of their details. The rationale is that if this were the situation, implied consent would then be justified, which is inconsistent with world-wide ideal techniques.

Though Vietnam’s prevailing facts security rules do not expressly involve such consent to be affirmative or implied, the Draft PDPD has proposed that consent ought to be voluntary, based on total facts, and that the failure of the knowledge subject to reply does not essentially represent consent, that means that if the Draft PDPD is passed according to how it is at this time formulated, consent need to then be express.

In addition, the Legislation on Info Know-how 2006 prescribes that the processing of own data for the reason of signing, amending, or undertaking a contract [using information, products, services in cyberspace] shall be legitimate without the need of the consent of the details topic. What can be inferred from this provision is that by getting into into a agreement, the knowledge topic is not deemed to have presented his or her consent to the processing of details instead, this is the place no consent is either presented or essential.

Specified the shown obscurity and decentralization of data protection regulations, it is anticipated that the Draft PDPD will be the to start with-at any time in depth legal instrument guiding the implementation of individual information protection regimes and harmonizing conflicting desire of unique stakeholders.


In excess of the several years, defending children’s informational privateness has become a controversial difficulty. From a legal perspective, there are two queries: to what extent does it rely upon parental handle and consent, and how is this component incorporated into the law searching for to secure children’s informational privateness?


Information is presented for instructional and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as lawful tips. This may perhaps qualify as “Lawyer Promotion” necessitating see in some jurisdictions. Prior success do not ensure very similar results. For extra details, remember to visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/disclaimers.